Phoebus Analysis

Well, we just had a formal review of our analysis boards.  The class split up into groups of 3's and 4's and each found their own issue or question to analyze pertaining to Phoebus.  The group I was in chose Pedestrian Friendly Streets.  Most of the class chose to compose their boards digitally.  I was a bit nervous about our board because we chose to do it by hand, and a friendly email from our teacher reminded us that our past precedent boards had been a bit amateurish.  But I guess our craft worked because the jury liked it. 

 

We broke our analysis up into three sections.  

RED:Most Pedestrian Friendly

ORANGE:Semi Pedestrian Friendly

YELLOW:Needs Improvement 

The main info the boards were to provide was Documentation, Analysis, and Examples of Findings, all pertaining to the issue the group chose.  Also, as with everything you pin up in architecture, the board must be able to get your point across without you being there to explain it.  We had Nicole Knight, a thesis student, come and critic our presentations.  She gave us excellent and very useful feedback.  Thanks Nicole.

I have also included another groups board that I thought worked well.  

I grouped up with Jessica and Kendra.

The second group consisted of Noel, Latrina, and Syreeta.

After the crits we were given a couple 

more days to fix our boards before we turned em in for a grade.

.

.